🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial move to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

European Movement

In Europe, a increasing group of nations are moving toward parallel measures.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the PM declaring that smartphones and networks are "stealing our kids' youth". A law could be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is set to introduce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to authenticate the identity and age of social media account holders. Authorities have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "one of the tools in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has asked the legislature to approve a proposal raising the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a comparable action, including an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Dutch government has advised families to restrict their children from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has approved a symbolic motion demanding a ban for under-16s except if a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it highlights of the "compulsive" nature of these apps, the resolution does not establish mandatory rules.

"A strong age limit is a good starting point," stated the MEP driving the initiative.

The UK: A Cautious Approach

For the United Kingdom, the government has remained open to a possible ban, stating that "no measure is discarded" but stressing any policy must be "grounded in robust research".

Previously, interest gathered behind a legislative effort to impose restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end modified. However, the government pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Campaign organizations have raised concerns. An organization founded by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after being exposed to dangerous platform posts suggests that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when teens turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to design platforms and apps that are secure and suitable for minors," commented a leading online safety campaigner.

The US: A Decentralized Approach

In the United States, action is primarily unfolding at the regional level due to federal stalemate.

• The state of Utah demands guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a law barring under-14s from accessing social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• The state of Virginia has passed a law restricting minors to one hour of social media time per day, with extra access requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed measures requiring adult authorization for teenagers to create social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and calls from certain politicians to follow this example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Views

Apart from the West, further states are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, international agencies strike a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "might backfire". The body points out that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated youth and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize safety.

As this global discussion unfolds, the steps of the Australian government and several other countries demonstrate that governments around the world are less and less prepared to stand by for platforms to act voluntarily.